Allow me to get this out of the way first;
Really??? You're now at the point that you'll "go postal"?
It would be appreciated if you would be so kind as to ensure that you have the correct target recipient for your criticisms. I did not make any suggestion of going postal. I merely responded to a sarcastically made, and I am absolutely certain not literally intended, reference to a shooting as a possible concluding solution that was made by someone else above. If this comment is not to your liking, I can only suggest that you to take it up with him as I did not make it.
You did note that the warranty is for two years when you bought it, right?
Yes, and I did clearly write that very fact in the very first post.
I also eluded to the fact that this is not the normal service life expected of these units. Excluding the issue of battery life, most people have these units for many years and many thousands of miles without any problem. This one has only been used around a dozen times. In reality the entire first year it was not used at all. It has suffered neither abuse nor neglect. It seems evident to me that this particular unit does not measure up to the overall high reliability standards of Sena products. It should not have suffered such a catastrophic failure after such little usage. It is clear to me that this is a case of a defective unit. I do not think that it is indicative of their entire product line being unreliable. This one is simply a lemon.
I don’t expect or think that it is reasonable for anyone to expect Sena to routinely accept responsibility for units which are past warranty. However, in a case where there is an abnormal premature failure of a unit that is not within the norm, I do think that they should offer some kind of support to their customer who after all did purchase their product in good faith but yet still drew the short straw and received a dud unit.
It's not like you have no options available for a battery. A package of two batteries cost less than $20 on Amazon.
Your assumption being that the problem is the battery in which case this unit can be cheaply repaired. That assumption is not at all assured.
Regardless of whether the battery is the problem or not, and keeping in mind that this thread was posted about what I believe to be poor customer service and not about the actual product, this logic escapes me. The delivery of poor customer service has already taken place. The availability of cheap replacement batteries elsewhere does not alter that. It has already happened.
If Sena did sell batteries, would you complain that they sell them for $40 and you can find them for less on Amazon?
To answer your question no. They are free to ask whatever price they wish. If their price is disproportionately inflated to the point that it took them to far out of what I consider to be an acceptable value, I am equally free to voice my displeasure with that pricing by spending my money elsewhere and not giving it to them. I suspect that most people including yourself would do the same with your money.
Most situations have two sides. I wonder what the story would be if they were to respond here.
There isn’t really any room for different interpretations. One thing that Sena is very good at is logging the communications with their customer’s. As stated, this is part of why I suspect I had to file a claim even though a warranty replacement was not what I was requesting.
Every communication, both mine and theirs, is date and time stamped as well as logged word for word as written. It is all of this is a matter of factual record that both Sena and I have a copy of. As much as I am not pleased with the outcome there is precious little place in any of these exchanges where there is any room for interpretation. They were all straight forward questions and straight forward responses.
The second complaint was that they don't cover their products for warranty coverage...after the warranty expires. Huh? Why is that their fault?
No, it was not. The second complaint was that they would not even look at the claim and rejected it out-of-hand based solely on the date of purchase. They initially did not even consider the reason why the claim was being submitted or allow me the opportunity to explain any possible extenuating circumstances that may be in play. It was simply immediately rejected.
In the event that the use of the word “claim” is a source of confusion leading to the belief that I was requesting warranty this is not the case. I have used this term because that is the Sena process I had to use as mandated by Sena. At the very beginning of this process the Sena representative informed me that I needed to submit a claim for them to look in to it. Presumably this is the process that they use to gather the required information and track communications with their customers, which is fine. I knew that the warranty had expired and I was not attempting to file a warranty claim. I only wanted to ask about getting the unit serviced or repaired but to do so I needed to file what they refer to as a "claim".
And your third complaint was that they don't offer a repair facility. Would your fourth complaint be that the repair was almost as much as a new unit?
Or authorize others to repair these units on their behalf but I take your point nonetheless. Hard to answer that without knowing what the repair cost would be but it would certainly be nice to have the option available and it is not- which is what the complaint was actually about. The lack of any available options of any kind other than full out replacement of a very expensive unit with another very expensive unit, regardless of whether the defect is minor or not, is the issue.
Oh...that's right...the Sena you're complaining about …….
Actually no, this thread has not been a complaint about the Sena unit at all. What this thread is about from the beginning is the customer service that has been received from Sena, not their product.
As a matter of fact, the opposite is true. I replied to another person earlier in this thread cautioning him not to use my opinion of Sena’s customer service as a deterrent to buying a Sena. I clearly stated that, while I believe this particular unit to be a lemon, I find Sena communicators in general to indeed be good products.
……. isn't even yours. It's your brothers.
I am at a loss as to what point you are making here. You took the time to highlight this in boldface and underline it so it presumably is of importance to your viewpoint but I have missed it. If you care to expand maybe I can offer an insight in response.
I would also like to point out that I have already written in this thread that my opinion is not based solely on this one incident of this one dead Sena unit. It is based on this incident as well as two other previous instances where I contacted Sena support, on my own behalf, and received no helpful assistance at all. In fact, they actually gave me incorrect information regarding their software compatibility. So, this opinion is based on an accumulation of bad experiences with their customer service, not just this one instance that seems to have been focused on.