ST1100Y
Site Supporter
... for those who want to be cremated on the go ...
What do you call a bunch of Tesla Cybertrucks sitting under a tree?
- Thread starter W0QNX
- Start date
Sadlsor
Site Supporter
ALL of 'em!Man, how many ST1100s I could buy for $82,000 ...
If I was to spend $80K+ for a car or truck no ST would be on my mind. If ya got the money spend it anyway you like.
I've seen 6 CTs out my way. Some of them have been vinyl wrapped. The wrapping looks sharp but the parcel underneath is still ugly. People following the mind of Muskie said he wasn't trying to make the CT attractive and he certainly succeed. Some say. . . The CT is angular because the preferred steel can't be stamped. And that Muskie believes the old saw "there's no such thing as bad publicity" and he lives by that daily.
There are about 3M+ eVs on the road so they are working for some people. That one isn't in my immediate future doesn't mean they have no utility for others. The CT is pretty lacking in so many ways. Even if somehow it was the perfect vehicle for me functionally it's just too ugly. I couldn't abide. There are a few pricey eVs I like that are well under $80K+. But that's not today and probably not tomorrow.
I've seen 6 CTs out my way. Some of them have been vinyl wrapped. The wrapping looks sharp but the parcel underneath is still ugly. People following the mind of Muskie said he wasn't trying to make the CT attractive and he certainly succeed. Some say. . . The CT is angular because the preferred steel can't be stamped. And that Muskie believes the old saw "there's no such thing as bad publicity" and he lives by that daily.
There are about 3M+ eVs on the road so they are working for some people. That one isn't in my immediate future doesn't mean they have no utility for others. The CT is pretty lacking in so many ways. Even if somehow it was the perfect vehicle for me functionally it's just too ugly. I couldn't abide. There are a few pricey eVs I like that are well under $80K+. But that's not today and probably not tomorrow.
Andrew Shadow
Site Supporter
Got it. Normally reply to what the author is believed to have been thinking rather than what was written- Makes perfect sense now. Thanks for the clarification. Say hi to the other Toms for me.I can not reply to what you write as I have no idea what you are thinking.
Tom
The Toms voted: they really appreciate your short concise reply and ...again we can agree, we "arrive at the same conclusion".
Tom
Andrew Shadow
Site Supporter
If the conclusion was even the part of the discussion sure, but that's OK, carry on.The Toms voted: they really appreciate your short concise reply and ...again we can agree, we "arrive at the same conclusion".
Tom