This will be an interesting science project.
Electricity and H2 will work for short distances and light loads.
They just do not have the energy density required for the long haul and heavy loads up a hill. This is where diesel is supreme.
Cryo H2 is like having TNT in your side cases. if you think bunning batteries is bad. You saw what happened to a failed rocket launch....
I have wasted too much time looking into the broken climate science hoax.
Maybe the world will wake up and realize that we are constantly being told a lie to hold up the façade.
There is no connection between the amount of Co2 in the air and temperature. None.
If any, it might have one in a million effect. That is so small that it makes no difference.
A total shut down of fossil fuels will not fix the climate.
However a 50/50 solution of gas and electric would be better as we need both for a better future.
We will need thousands of new natural gas power plants to power all the electric cars, trucks, stoves, heaters, water heaters, AC units., scooters, tooth brushes...
They need to be building thousands of them NOW to be available when the silly rules go into effect. Where are all the power plants being built?
The AC power transformer in your back yard needs to be ten times bigger. Who is upgrading all of those? power towers and wires being strung?
Solar is a joke. The sun is down when you need it most. You only get 8 to 5 hours of full power. Cloudy days you might get 10% power.
Net zero will not fix the climate, Trying to get there will not work and is not even necessary.
A fake problem that can not be fixed.
This is a sorry tragedy that is unfolding before us.
The climate is normal. All is good. It is just the weather and normal variation.
Go out and enjoy the ride while we can!
Please take this in the sense of a discussion.
Climate change is real, our climate is out of kilter, but how far it is man made is a moot point, it is here, our actions are not helping and what are we going to do about it?
To deny these facts at this point in time when you can see what is happening with your very own eyes is almost Monty Python-esque and to firmly dispute climate change is grotesque to the point of being on par with a flat earther level of ridiculousness.
https://www.google.com/search?q=mon...#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:54bc8505,vid:ee6-sI9rdtA
But that too is not the point, the point is that we need a stable climate to stay on the level we have now, not only that, our entire civilization relies on a cheap and abundant energy source, Now there are two ways to generate enough power to run our civilization, cheap and abundant but damaging to the climate, or very expensive and scarce, just not as polluting.
The math has been done and the verdict is in with the result that even if we were to stop creating atmospheric carbon, right now, at this very minute, we will still be in an entirely different world in a few short decades.
The other point is that it is becoming more and more expensive to generate power via fossil fuels, it is in the name."Fossil fuel" is finite and when it is gone, there is no more. in the Seventies for every calorie of net energy invested you could expect a return of 25 calories. To put that in perspective, in the seventies we burned a six square mile cube of oil every year, at the turn of the millennium we burned three and a half billion metric tons of oil, now we burn a billion metric tons more... each...and...every...year!
Now in the 2020ties for a calorie of oil burned for extraction, processing and distribution, the ratio is down to 1.75 with a declining return, at some point in the near future the energy source of fossil fuels is going to turn into an energy sink, meaning you are investing more calories than you are getting out of it.
By then we should have an alternative way to power our civilization in place or we will be back in the 18th century and unable to feed and support our planetary population of eight billion, I can see our extinction when this happens, only we will go not with a bang, but with a whimper.
