ST1300 longevity

Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
3
Location
Little Chute, WI
I have an 2006 ST1300 with approximately 50,000 mi on the odometer. The only thing I have done to it so far is oil and tire changes, thermostat and brake fluid replacement. It still runs great but am at the point where I need to decide to whether to spend the money on upgrades, maintenance and repairs or purchase a new bike. I have never checked the valves, the suspension is getting a little weak and I would like to add cruise control as my wrist and hand gets awfully sore. Could use a better seat also. I love the bike and so far, have no problem handling it (yet) and really can't find new a bike that compares. Any thoughts. How long will my bike be reliable and not nickel and dime me.
 
Based on my 2006 with 100,000 miles I would say that you should be able to go at least to 150k before needing anything major like hoses, alternator, clutch, u joints or water pump. It is a Honda after all.
 
If my BMW F800GT could get past 100K, don't you think a Honda could do better?

Seriously, you have a bike with an engine the same size as one of my cars in the past, and putting out more horsepower than several of my other cars. It's not working hard at all at whatever speed you ride at. I think one of the riders here has 300,000 miles (not km) on his. If I did my math right, you're averaging 2600 miles a year. I'd keep it. Your bike is not going to be worn out in the next 20 years. ;)

really can't find new a bike that compares
We all like to "window shop" when a new bike comes out, but if we're smart we start looking at what the new bike will give us vs what the additional cost will be...and go away smiling with the bike we already have.

Chris
 
I ‘window shop’ as well, see what things cost these days, realize what I have, then ride away smiling as you said. As far as reliability, all vehicles will wear (or in the case of a bike, suspension, seats, etc. will wear)- repair and replace what’s needed and ride on- these Hondas (I can speak of my 1100s and my Silverwing) are insanely reliable. The 1300 my brother keeps in CO is equally reliable. The decision to get a replacement bike oftentimes is an emotional one- there will always be a better, faster, etc. bike out there than what you have- in 6 months or so, it’ll likely be ‘old’ to you and likely have no benefit over what you currently have. I’d love a new GW (meaning newest generation) but I can’t justify it based on the current riding I do, and I’ve done some upgrades to my existing bike to make it as ‘GW like’ as I possibly can (well, for me anyway).
 
How long will my bike be reliable and not nickel and dime me.

You've never heard of the "million mile" Honda riders? Such as Allan Zahrt and Phil Steiner ??

Allan Zahrt reached one million miles on his 1975 Gold Wing. Phil Steiner, have reported impressive mileage on his Gold Wings.

And hey, in 2024, Phil was 82.5 years old. Steiner figured he’s ridden over 2 million miles on Gold Wings in his lifetime, earning him the nickname “Million-Mile” Phil.

 
I think 2008 is when Honda upgraded the ST1300 a bit and it's the same as my 2012, which now has over 194,000 miles on it. Still on the same clutch. Did have to change out the clutch slave cylinder and the SMC. Repaired the rear shock, but that's to be expected eventually. Checked the valves once a year or so and although a couple are near the limit, have never adjusted any, Parts are still available. I'd say to keep it.
 
....Your bike is not going to be worn out in the next 20 years. ;)

But still needs maintenance. Fine if you can do your own wrenching.

It is getting harder to find mechanics willing/able to work on the 1300, some even turning down bikes more than 10 year old.

I'd keep the 1300 forever if I could find a mechanic for it. Most shops don't even know what this bike is anymore....including dealerships!

Ironically, there is one shop I go to where the owner knows about the 1300...but he's been on an 1100 forever and much prefers it!
 
At 50K miles, it's just barely broken in!

My first, 2005 ST1300 had 174.3K miles on it when I sold it to my son in Portland and that was back in 2013. He now has over 190K on it and it's still going strong.

My other four ST1300s have plenty of miles on them and plenty more to go. And although I only have two left (both with under 50K), I have no issues to worry about on either at this point.

The one thing I would say, get yourself a manual, so you can do the work yourself.
 
The decision to get a replacement bike oftentimes is an emotional one- there will always be a better, faster, etc. bike out there than what you have- in 6 months or so, it’ll likely be ‘old’ to you and likely have no benefit over what you currently have.
I think there are two ways to look at life and especially vehicles we use. One is to always be consumed by what the Marketing folks decide we can't live without. The other is to look at what we have and be happy with it.

The Honda ST's were always considered as one of the ultimate sport-touring bikes. Despite the years going by, what made them so great has not changed. Sure, now I can get this electronic gizmo or that one...but those are not the core of what makes a bike great. They're fluff.

Chris
 
Have read through some of the below to get an idea about longevity of an ST1300. He is closing in on 500,000 miles now.

 
I have an 2006 ST1300 with approximately 50,000 mi on the odometer. The only thing I have done to it so far is oil and tire changes, thermostat and brake fluid replacement. It still runs great but am at the point where I need to decide to whether to spend the money on upgrades, maintenance and repairs or purchase a new bike. I have never checked the valves, the suspension is getting a little weak and I would like to add cruise control as my wrist and hand gets awfully sore. Could use a better seat also. I love the bike and so far, have no problem handling it (yet) and really can't find new a bike that compares. Any thoughts. How long will my bike be reliable and not nickel and dime me.
I sold my 2006 with 32K miles on it, the engine was untouch, I did minor customicing details on it.
The reason to sell it was I was at this time 81 years old and the bike was kind of too high and too heavy for me.
I miss her every day, it was the best bike I ever had. Now I ride a Honda shadow and a Harley Sportster, they are not even close to the ST.
If you can handle it, do not sell it.
 
It depends on what you all nickel and dime. You'll need small stuff in the next 50,000 mi. Parts will be harder to get. Likely fewer and fewer dealers will be familiar with the ST. The engine is near bulletproof. The rest of the bike is more subject to the vagaries of time and use. Mishaps may mean damage to plastics that can or won't be easily replaced or repaired.

You've already mentioned the suspension. Are you capable of removing the shock assembly and sending it ou

So can you and do you like to do your own maintenance. Finding a modern bike to replace the ST isn't easy. Changing your priorities to find a bike you like is – comparatively. I knew a couple of people what had some real money and at 50K mi it was time for a new bike. Always. Occasionally it was another copy. Occasionally it was a different bike.

Hang onto it a little longer before deciding whether or not to move on. Read the site to get better handle on what might be needed when and if it's something you can and are willing to do. There's lots of good accurate advice here that you won't get anywhere else.

Best of luck to ya.
 
Back
Top Bottom