I confess to being amazed many years ago when I learned that folks in the west were driving their cars for 20 years or longer
My Subaru Outback XT is 20 years old. People nowadays are longing for simple things like knobs for controls and such. I have knobs. No touch screen. Just knobs, buttons and a functionally laid out dash. And my 20 year old car that runs like new.
And no one can decide to turn off my car remotely because they feel like it. Insurance companies don't...can't...monitor...what I'm doing either.
A different train of thought...
One thing I've picked up from this thread is many are looking for a replacement to the ST1100/1300. It seems like you're thinking you need another 650-720 lb bike to do "touring". And you're getting older. (The thought occurs to me that I could get banned for what I'll say next...) Sigh... I hope Mellow is in a good mood.
I think some of you need to reevaluate where the technology is today.
- You don't need weight. Your bikes weigh at least 200 lbs more than mine does.
- You don't need a car engine to do 70 mph and more on the freeways. I get by with 90-100 hp...and can keep up with you all day long with ease. The hp figures are more for the Marketing folks to convince you that you can't live without it. But actual roads and your tire's contact patch don't lie.
- You don't need a shaft drive. I had a belt drive on my F800GT and the first belt lasted 53,000 miles. No maintenance on the belt during that time. The F900XR I have now has a chain. Oh my gosh, what will the world come to next???!!!
I have 9600 miles on the bike now (in less than a year) and it hasn't needed to be adjusted and shows no wear to the chain or sprockets. Technology has changed what we all knew from before. A chain drive has a lot of advantages, and now few disadvantages.
When I did a test ride on a F800GT, I was amazed at how it handled turbulence on the freeways. My ride at the time was a Honda NT700V. A superb sports-touring bike that had excellent wind management...and weighed a hundred pounds more than the BMW F800GT. How could this be? I was genuinely surprised. Yet the BMW bike cut through the air better and was a hundred pounds lighter...with 50% more horsepower. Nice combination.

And my BMW F900XR is in many ways a far better sports-touring bike than my F800GT was.
So what is a "sports-touring" bike? I think the concept has changed over the years along with the technology. If you needed 700 lbs and a car engine to get you down the road comfortably...why do I read that the mileage in this thread is so little...with a few exceptions? The OP has a 2006...with 50,000 miles on it? I'm not trying to be rude, but that seems like a garage queen. I'll have that many miles (if my body can keep up) in three years...not 19-20.
My F800GT had 107,000 miles on it when I traded it in. If the rear wheel bearing hadn't seemed dodgy and more importantly, my wife had not told me to buy a new bike, I'd still have it. 800ccs. 100K+ miles...and it ran like a champ. And took me over two-thirds of the US comfortably, year after year.
My point is not to sell BMWs. I could care less about the manufacturer. My point is that we have a great sport-touring bike now in the ST's...and close our minds to where the motorcycle industry has evolved to. It's not all bad.
Chris