Looking for more power

Every carbed bike I've had has done the midrange stumble when cold or a lot of city drivin, just bounce the tach needle of the redline in 2nd and 3rd gear a couple times after its warmed up should fix it. They like to be run hard.
 
Let's be realistic here, the ST1100 12.7 second 1/4 mile time is about on par with air-cooled 750s from the mid to late '70s. In comparison to any modern performance oriented motorcycle (no Harleys, Indians, cruisers, etc.) that's not really fast at all.

Thirty years ago, performance oriented bikes were well into the 10's, as was the FJR1300 almost 20 years ago when it was introduced.
well maybe but almost 1/2 second faster and more top speed
 
The gain is noticeable. My ST1100 accelerates faster with the more aggressive cams. As well as higher lift and longer duration, the more aggressive cams have valve overlap which improves both scavenging and intake charge. IMHO, if the OP is sufficiently motivated to get some more performance and doesn't already have the high performance cams, then this is the really the only realistic option available (in addition to ensuring that the motor is already tuned up properly as others have pointed out).

While I can appreciate the anecdote, it's just that. If there is no data to back it up, how do you quantify the gains? Swapping cams is a fair bit of work, I think I'd like to know what the results will be. To my mind what is needed is a set of custom ground cams with more lift and duration. Probably could get away with a re-grind, and then shim out to compensate for the reduced base circle, but that's a bit of a kludge. RT
 
I never questioned that the bike is quick i was just interested in seeing what everyone uses for aftermarket upgrades.
As far as I know, there are no aftermarket upgrades to increase hp. Suspension, yes. Windshields, yes (they don't usually increase performance), etc. There is a temp sensor marketed that is supposed to fool the bikes sensor into thinking its a little cooler than it really is thereby richening the mixture, but that has gotten mixed reviews. Aftermarket exhausts are available, but I'm not aware of anyone posting before and after dyno figures for any of those. Bottom line, there simply were not enough of these made for aftermarket speed shops to design and sell accessories that might increase performance. A supercharger/turbocharger? Where are you going to hang it? These are compactly designed bikes with not a lot of room for anything aftermarket.

I semi facetiously suggested to someone else looking for more acceleration to lose some weight. That is probably the only way to make your bike faster. Get out your dremel and start grinding every excess ounce off the bike. Hook up your laptop, download the engine's map from the ICU and tweak it then reinstall it. If your engineering and computer skills are not sufficient for these tasks you might be stuck with a stock naked bike. And that's not a bad thing.
 
I swapped the cams when I was adjusting valve clearances, so I had the cams out anyway. My conclusion was based on my experience riding the bike before and after.

As far as quantifying the gains, I don't have a before and after dyno, but can offer this:

-A lower lift height on an intake valve reduces the maximum amount of gas that can flow into the cylinder for a given duration.
-For a given intake lift height, more duration increases the maximum amount of gas than can flow into the cylinder.
-Valve overlap makes it possible for an intake charge to be higher than the maximum obtainable by the swept volume of the cylinder alone (which is the most you'll get on the later model year Honda cams since they don't have valve overlap).

I don't understand your comment about "custom ground cams with more lift and duration". I did install cams with more lift and duration; I just didn't have them custom ground.

Honda clearly changed their cam design to meet emissions requirements. There is no other explanation.

You installed early stock cams, yes? I know they are slightly more aggressive, ie, more lift and duration, so more air/fuel in, more exhaust out. How much valve overlap is optimal for an ST? No idea, but I'm pretty sure it could be figured out based on the dozens of other V shaped engines out there. Look for one with a similar bore/stroke ratio, head design, and go from there. Cam design is a very mature subject, any cam grinder could make recommendations and come pretty close. Custom cams would allow a much larger increase in lift/duration as well as whatever overlap is desired. A lot more power could be made, but the emissions would be much higher. That goes with the territory. Custom ground would allow a whole lot more than the small increase from the early Honda cams.

RT
 
Oh. Yes... Right.
Mine too does that sometimes. And it's an easy fix.
See, between five and six thousand RPM... when it does that... the bike is trying to tell you : "maybe you could try shifting gears now".

Just kidding. :biggrin:

Well, I'm also still new to the ST1100 and I am not as knoledgeable as many members on this forum. I've learned a lot since a year, though.

When I bought my ST1100, last year, it hasn't had run much for the last two three years.

So, at first, yeah, the engine was kinda missing an explosion here and there. Every two three second. I looked at my spark plugs and they were all covered by a black layer of carbon deposit. I cleaned them. And... to make a long story short, I burned a few gaz tank with "seafoam" or injector / carburator cleaner in the gas tank. It now really runs smoothly.

Do you have lots of mileage on your ST ?
Thinking, maybe you could check the valves clearance.
I appreciate that shift joke sir that got me good! i have replaced the plugs and wires but i havent thought about a fuel treatment yet so that will most likely be my next step. I usually use Lucas treatments but i see everyo e is saying to use sea foam! Is there a difference i should know about?
 
All jokes aside, I have inserted the best answer is bellow;

ST1300 Tech


The most important question is how many miles has your ST done?
If the answer is in, or close to~ 6 digits. Then I may be able to give you a few pointers to get back to a closer to stock performance.
I bought the bike as a rebiuld someone had started but didnt have time to put back together. He never got far enought to mess with any major mechanical parts but he had got rid of most of the stock body panels including the gauge cluster. I didnt mind as this was my first road bike and i knew i would be going through some learning pains and having a really nice bike would not be a good idea. So with that i dont know exact mileage but the last recorded millage on the title is 67,548 miles. Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Yes.

Intake cam lobe height is 0.8mm higher; exhaust is 0.2mm higher. Intake duration is 15° more; exhaust 10° more. When you add in valve overlap where there was previously none, it's enough to notice a difference in performance when riding.

I don't need to. Honda did it when they designed the engine.

And then you would hit the pistons that already have reliefs cut for the stock cam profiles. No thanks.

Maybe, but it would require modifying the pistons (if possible) or custom pistons. Not worth it. I like my $100 drop-in upgrade.

You are missing the point. There is more there, likely a lot more. I don't doubt that your stock cam upgrade made a difference. The question would be how much. With regard to changing to custom, the engine would have to be degree'd with the existing cams, and mapped. The valve protrusion would have to be verified, with modeling clay in the combustion chamber, to see how close the valves come to the pistons now. Then again with the new custom grind. Fly cutting pistons is no big deal, done all the time in the hotrod world. Some intrepid souls have done it by hand, in situ. None of this is particularly difficult, but it is time consuming, and pretty invasive engine-wise. Which is why nobody has bothered with a low-volume, obscure old motorcycle. Say a new set of cams produced a 25hp gain, with a little carb tuning? How many sets of cams would the cam grinder sell? I'm guessing a set of custom cams would be well North of $1K. How many customers would there be? Not many. Maybe none.

RT
 
You are missing the point. There is more there, likely a lot more. I don't doubt that your stock cam upgrade made a difference. The question would be how much. With regard to changing to custom, the engine would have to be degree'd with the existing cams, and mapped. The valve protrusion would have to be verified, with modeling clay in the combustion chamber, to see how close the valves come to the pistons now. Then again with the new custom grind. Fly cutting pistons is no big deal, done all the time in the hotrod world. Some intrepid souls have done it by hand, in situ. None of this is particularly difficult, but it is time consuming, and pretty invasive engine-wise. Which is why nobody has bothered with a low-volume, obscure old motorcycle. Say a new set of cams produced a 25hp gain, with a little carb tuning? How many sets of cams would the cam grinder sell? I'm guessing a set of custom cams would be well North of $1K. How many customers would there be? Not many. Maybe none.

RT
Would be cheaper to drop in a chevy small block:rofl1::rofl1::rofl1:
 
Yes, if you want to spend the money (which nobody is going to do on a ST1100) then of course you can get more. That is obvious, captain :). So the only realistic option for a performance gain is to install the earlier cams (if you are running with the later cams). It's irrelevant to me to know exactly how much of a gain it is.

It would be nice to see a dyno pull to see what the gain was, that's all. I would consider it at timing belt replacement if the gains were quantifiable. Or I can keep riding and not worry about it.

RT
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrp
It would be nice to see a dyno pull to see what the gain was, that's all. I would consider it at timing belt replacement if the gains were quantifiable. Or I can keep riding and not worry about it.

RT

One could probably have hot cams or webcams come up with a custom grind for the 1100 since it's carbureted. But you'll be messing with the breather box and the exhaust to make it worth your while. It's already high compression, so you may end up not being able to run pump gas if you put a fatter charge in there. If someone actually goes through with all this nonsense, please start a thread for us to follow All of your heartache and bills so that we can live vicariously through all the excitement without any of the pain or expense.
 
Drop a gear. Bring rpms up in the moment of clutching to match engine speed as you re-engage. Leave all cages in dust. Much cheaper than engine mods and applicable on the road more than the road race, where you would be high in the RPMs and not needing to drop a tooth to find better acceleration. Technique will trump nearly anything you might do to a ST1100 motor without really getting deep into it. There is no significant, easy, bolt-on power for the STs.

Nothing to do with racing. Everything to do with technique. If dropping a tooth doesn't help you make the jump to light speed in a more satisfactory manner, wrap the throttle further. If that's still not doing it for you, it would be cheaper to buy a cbr600f3 with 300 less pounds and almost as much hp compared to the cost of adding 10 measurable hp to your ST.
 
It's already high compression, so you may end up not being able to run pump gas if you put a fatter charge in there.

it would be cheaper to buy a cbr600f3 with 300 less pounds and almost as much hp compared to the cost of adding 10 measurable hp to your ST.
stock ST1100s run just fine, actually best, on 87 octane regular gas since they have a rather unimpressive compression ratio of 10.0:1. Since its common for other motorcycles to have CRs in the 12.0 to 13.0 range, I wouldn't characterize the ST1100 engine as high compression. But, we're in agreement that pursuing power gains through engine mods is mostly a waste of time and money that would be better spent on the purchase of a different bike.
 
stock ST1100s run just fine, actually best, on 87 octane regular gas since they have a rather unimpressive compression ratio of 10.0:1. Since its common for other motorcycles to have CRs in the 12.0 to 13.0 range, I wouldn't characterize the ST1100 engine as high compression. But, we're in agreement that pursuing power gains through engine mods is mostly a waste of time and money that would be better spent on the purchase of a different bike.

I made the mistake of assuming the 1100s had the same compression as the 13s.
 
Back
Top Bottom