Every carbed bike I've had has done the midrange stumble when cold or a lot of city drivin, just bounce the tach needle of the redline in 2nd and 3rd gear a couple times after its warmed up should fix it. They like to be run hard.
well maybe but almost 1/2 second faster and more top speedLet's be realistic here, the ST1100 12.7 second 1/4 mile time is about on par with air-cooled 750s from the mid to late '70s. In comparison to any modern performance oriented motorcycle (no Harleys, Indians, cruisers, etc.) that's not really fast at all.
Thirty years ago, performance oriented bikes were well into the 10's, as was the FJR1300 almost 20 years ago when it was introduced.
The gain is noticeable. My ST1100 accelerates faster with the more aggressive cams. As well as higher lift and longer duration, the more aggressive cams have valve overlap which improves both scavenging and intake charge. IMHO, if the OP is sufficiently motivated to get some more performance and doesn't already have the high performance cams, then this is the really the only realistic option available (in addition to ensuring that the motor is already tuned up properly as others have pointed out).
As far as I know, there are no aftermarket upgrades to increase hp. Suspension, yes. Windshields, yes (they don't usually increase performance), etc. There is a temp sensor marketed that is supposed to fool the bikes sensor into thinking its a little cooler than it really is thereby richening the mixture, but that has gotten mixed reviews. Aftermarket exhausts are available, but I'm not aware of anyone posting before and after dyno figures for any of those. Bottom line, there simply were not enough of these made for aftermarket speed shops to design and sell accessories that might increase performance. A supercharger/turbocharger? Where are you going to hang it? These are compactly designed bikes with not a lot of room for anything aftermarket.I never questioned that the bike is quick i was just interested in seeing what everyone uses for aftermarket upgrades.
I swapped the cams when I was adjusting valve clearances, so I had the cams out anyway. My conclusion was based on my experience riding the bike before and after.
As far as quantifying the gains, I don't have a before and after dyno, but can offer this:
-A lower lift height on an intake valve reduces the maximum amount of gas that can flow into the cylinder for a given duration.
-For a given intake lift height, more duration increases the maximum amount of gas than can flow into the cylinder.
-Valve overlap makes it possible for an intake charge to be higher than the maximum obtainable by the swept volume of the cylinder alone (which is the most you'll get on the later model year Honda cams since they don't have valve overlap).
I don't understand your comment about "custom ground cams with more lift and duration". I did install cams with more lift and duration; I just didn't have them custom ground.
Honda clearly changed their cam design to meet emissions requirements. There is no other explanation.
That is for the ST1300. He has an ST1100.There is a temp sensor marketed that is supposed to fool the bikes sensor into thinking its a little cooler than it really is thereby richening the mixture, but that has gotten mixed reviews.
Right, I kept forgetting he is talking about an 1100. Should have said, if you want more power, get a 1300....That is for the ST1300. He has an ST1100.
I appreciate that shift joke sir that got me good! i have replaced the plugs and wires but i havent thought about a fuel treatment yet so that will most likely be my next step. I usually use Lucas treatments but i see everyo e is saying to use sea foam! Is there a difference i should know about?Oh. Yes... Right.
Mine too does that sometimes. And it's an easy fix.
See, between five and six thousand RPM... when it does that... the bike is trying to tell you : "maybe you could try shifting gears now".
Just kidding.
Well, I'm also still new to the ST1100 and I am not as knoledgeable as many members on this forum. I've learned a lot since a year, though.
When I bought my ST1100, last year, it hasn't had run much for the last two three years.
So, at first, yeah, the engine was kinda missing an explosion here and there. Every two three second. I looked at my spark plugs and they were all covered by a black layer of carbon deposit. I cleaned them. And... to make a long story short, I burned a few gaz tank with "seafoam" or injector / carburator cleaner in the gas tank. It now really runs smoothly.
Do you have lots of mileage on your ST ?
Thinking, maybe you could check the valves clearance.
I bought the bike as a rebiuld someone had started but didnt have time to put back together. He never got far enought to mess with any major mechanical parts but he had got rid of most of the stock body panels including the gauge cluster. I didnt mind as this was my first road bike and i knew i would be going through some learning pains and having a really nice bike would not be a good idea. So with that i dont know exact mileage but the last recorded millage on the title is 67,548 miles. Any help would be much appreciated!All jokes aside, I have inserted the best answer is bellow;
ST1300 Tech
The most important question is how many miles has your ST done?
If the answer is in, or close to~ 6 digits. Then I may be able to give you a few pointers to get back to a closer to stock performance.
Yes.
Intake cam lobe height is 0.8mm higher; exhaust is 0.2mm higher. Intake duration is 15° more; exhaust 10° more. When you add in valve overlap where there was previously none, it's enough to notice a difference in performance when riding.
I don't need to. Honda did it when they designed the engine.
And then you would hit the pistons that already have reliefs cut for the stock cam profiles. No thanks.
Maybe, but it would require modifying the pistons (if possible) or custom pistons. Not worth it. I like my $100 drop-in upgrade.
Would be cheaper to drop in a chevy small blockYou are missing the point. There is more there, likely a lot more. I don't doubt that your stock cam upgrade made a difference. The question would be how much. With regard to changing to custom, the engine would have to be degree'd with the existing cams, and mapped. The valve protrusion would have to be verified, with modeling clay in the combustion chamber, to see how close the valves come to the pistons now. Then again with the new custom grind. Fly cutting pistons is no big deal, done all the time in the hotrod world. Some intrepid souls have done it by hand, in situ. None of this is particularly difficult, but it is time consuming, and pretty invasive engine-wise. Which is why nobody has bothered with a low-volume, obscure old motorcycle. Say a new set of cams produced a 25hp gain, with a little carb tuning? How many sets of cams would the cam grinder sell? I'm guessing a set of custom cams would be well North of $1K. How many customers would there be? Not many. Maybe none.
RT
Yes, if you want to spend the money (which nobody is going to do on a ST1100) then of course you can get more. That is obvious, captain. So the only realistic option for a performance gain is to install the earlier cams (if you are running with the later cams). It's irrelevant to me to know exactly how much of a gain it is.
It would be nice to see a dyno pull to see what the gain was, that's all. I would consider it at timing belt replacement if the gains were quantifiable. Or I can keep riding and not worry about it.
RT
stock ST1100s run just fine, actually best, on 87 octane regular gas since they have a rather unimpressive compression ratio of 10.0:1. Since its common for other motorcycles to have CRs in the 12.0 to 13.0 range, I wouldn't characterize the ST1100 engine as high compression. But, we're in agreement that pursuing power gains through engine mods is mostly a waste of time and money that would be better spent on the purchase of a different bike.It's already high compression, so you may end up not being able to run pump gas if you put a fatter charge in there.
it would be cheaper to buy a cbr600f3 with 300 less pounds and almost as much hp compared to the cost of adding 10 measurable hp to your ST.
ST engines ARE half of a V-8.How about half of a small block chevy
Wait, wait... hold on there!ST engines ARE half of a V-8.![]()
stock ST1100s run just fine, actually best, on 87 octane regular gas since they have a rather unimpressive compression ratio of 10.0:1. Since its common for other motorcycles to have CRs in the 12.0 to 13.0 range, I wouldn't characterize the ST1100 engine as high compression. But, we're in agreement that pursuing power gains through engine mods is mostly a waste of time and money that would be better spent on the purchase of a different bike.