Okay, nothing we don't all know but I thought it was an interesting response, and it took about 7 seconds to reply:
Deciding which is "better" between the Honda ST1100 and ST1300 depends largely on what you value in a motorcycle, as both are highly regarded sport-touring bikes with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Let’s break it down based on their design, performance, and practical use.The ST1100, produced from 1990 to 2002, is a proven classic. It’s powered by a 1,085cc longitudinal V4 engine, delivering smooth, reliable power—around 100 horsepower—and a torque curve suited for long-distance cruising. Its 28-liter fuel tank gives it an exceptional range, often exceeding 300 miles, making it a favorite for riders who prioritize endurance over flash. The bike’s low center of gravity, thanks to the under-seat fuel tank, aids handling despite its hefty 297kg (dry) weight. It’s known for rock-solid reliability, with many owners racking up hundreds of thousands of miles with minimal issues. The ST1100’s upright ergonomics, full fairing, and integrated panniers make it a comfortable mile-muncher, though its suspension and brakes (especially on non-ABS models pre-1996) can feel dated compared to modern standards. It’s less sporty, leaning heavily into the touring side of the sport-touring equation.The ST1300, introduced in 2002 and built until 2012, is the evolved successor. Its 1,261cc V4 bumps power up to about 125 horsepower, with fuel injection replacing the ST1100’s carburetors for sharper throttle response and easier maintenance. It’s still smooth but feels more potent, especially in roll-on acceleration. The ST1300 trims weight slightly (around 287kg dry) and shifts it lower with a split fuel tank design, improving balance. Handling is more responsive, aided by a lighter aluminum frame and updated suspension, though some riders note a shorter wheelbase (compared to the ST1100) can make it less planted at very high speeds when heavily loaded. Features like an electrically adjustable windscreen (standard from 2004) and optional ABS with linked brakes add modern convenience and safety. However, early models faced recalls—high-speed stability issues, grounding sumps—and it never quite earned the bulletproof reputation of its predecessor.In practice, the ST1100 wins on reliability and simplicity. Owners rave about its bombproof nature and lower cost of entry today (often $3,000-$4,000 for a good example). It’s ideal if you want a no-fuss, long-haul tourer and don’t mind its age—parts are still available, though some are getting scarce. The ST1300, typically $4,000-$6,000 used, offers more power, better handling, and updated tech, appealing to riders who want a blend of sport and touring with newer amenities. But its complexity (e.g., fuel injection, electronics) and past gremlins might deter those seeking the ST1100’s unshakable dependability.Rider feedback varies: some swear by the ST1100’s stability and charm, calling the ST1300 too “flashy” or less soulful; others prefer the ST1300’s refinement and agility, dismissing the ST1100 as outdated. For a middle-aged, mile-hungry rider—the typical ST demographic—the ST1100 might edge out if cost and durability top your list. If you crave more performance and modern touches, the ST1300 pulls ahead. Test-riding both, if possible, would settle it—your butt and wrists will tell you what specs can’t.
Deciding which is "better" between the Honda ST1100 and ST1300 depends largely on what you value in a motorcycle, as both are highly regarded sport-touring bikes with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Let’s break it down based on their design, performance, and practical use.The ST1100, produced from 1990 to 2002, is a proven classic. It’s powered by a 1,085cc longitudinal V4 engine, delivering smooth, reliable power—around 100 horsepower—and a torque curve suited for long-distance cruising. Its 28-liter fuel tank gives it an exceptional range, often exceeding 300 miles, making it a favorite for riders who prioritize endurance over flash. The bike’s low center of gravity, thanks to the under-seat fuel tank, aids handling despite its hefty 297kg (dry) weight. It’s known for rock-solid reliability, with many owners racking up hundreds of thousands of miles with minimal issues. The ST1100’s upright ergonomics, full fairing, and integrated panniers make it a comfortable mile-muncher, though its suspension and brakes (especially on non-ABS models pre-1996) can feel dated compared to modern standards. It’s less sporty, leaning heavily into the touring side of the sport-touring equation.The ST1300, introduced in 2002 and built until 2012, is the evolved successor. Its 1,261cc V4 bumps power up to about 125 horsepower, with fuel injection replacing the ST1100’s carburetors for sharper throttle response and easier maintenance. It’s still smooth but feels more potent, especially in roll-on acceleration. The ST1300 trims weight slightly (around 287kg dry) and shifts it lower with a split fuel tank design, improving balance. Handling is more responsive, aided by a lighter aluminum frame and updated suspension, though some riders note a shorter wheelbase (compared to the ST1100) can make it less planted at very high speeds when heavily loaded. Features like an electrically adjustable windscreen (standard from 2004) and optional ABS with linked brakes add modern convenience and safety. However, early models faced recalls—high-speed stability issues, grounding sumps—and it never quite earned the bulletproof reputation of its predecessor.In practice, the ST1100 wins on reliability and simplicity. Owners rave about its bombproof nature and lower cost of entry today (often $3,000-$4,000 for a good example). It’s ideal if you want a no-fuss, long-haul tourer and don’t mind its age—parts are still available, though some are getting scarce. The ST1300, typically $4,000-$6,000 used, offers more power, better handling, and updated tech, appealing to riders who want a blend of sport and touring with newer amenities. But its complexity (e.g., fuel injection, electronics) and past gremlins might deter those seeking the ST1100’s unshakable dependability.Rider feedback varies: some swear by the ST1100’s stability and charm, calling the ST1300 too “flashy” or less soulful; others prefer the ST1300’s refinement and agility, dismissing the ST1100 as outdated. For a middle-aged, mile-hungry rider—the typical ST demographic—the ST1100 might edge out if cost and durability top your list. If you crave more performance and modern touches, the ST1300 pulls ahead. Test-riding both, if possible, would settle it—your butt and wrists will tell you what specs can’t.
:
