Thought I'd add even though I have the equipment; my backup GPS (Montana 700i) has inReach capability: I still rely on cell data for tracking...
Tom
Tom
Doesn't matter as much as you think it does. As I said my wife often is able to track me when I have "no bars/ no cell" connection and can't call. Granted I also can't message her, but she pretty much knows where I am.Last week I did a shakedown run on my VStrom to Northern Ontario, riding in some pretty remote areas, no cell coverage for the most part.
GPS can tell the user where he is but is unable to share that info without a cell signal, the GPS satellites only send out a time code that your device uses to calculate your position but your device can’t send data to the satellite.still works since the app relies on the phone's GPS capabilities to provide the location
You're missing the point; GPS can tell where the user is and your phone can transmit that info with a weak ping to a single cell tower; without it a location had to be determined through triangulation with several towers. Again there are very few paved roads I've traveled in the last couple of years where my wife wasn't able to track my cell phone. During my recent trips to Big Bend TX, and around west Texas, as well as rural Tn, Ky,, WVa, and the Carolinas, a lot of the time we had no cell phone coverage, and no messaging, but from Florida she ALWAYS knew exactly where I was, and most of the time exactly how fast I was traveling.GPS can tell the user where he is but is unable to share that info without a cell signal, the GPS satellites only send out a time code that your device uses to calculate your position but your device can’t send data to the satellite.
Just waiting to see when she can cash in that big life insurance policy ...You're missing the point; GPS can tell where the user is and your phone can transmit that info with a weak ping to a single cell tower; without it a location had to be determined through triangulation with several towers. Again there are very few paved roads I've traveled in the last couple of years where my wife wasn't able to track my cell phone. During my recent trips to Big Bend TX, and around west Texas, as well as rural Tn, Ky,, WVa, and the Carolinas, a lot of the time we had no cell phone coverage, and no messaging, but from Florida she ALWAYS knew exactly where I was, and most of the time exactly how fast I was traveling.
Tom
Funny you should say that: Life360's location icon changes to a flaming rocket vehicle and indicates "risky driving" anytime I exceed 90 mph.Just waiting to see when she can cash in that big life insurance policy ...
Never! If all you want to share is location: simply turn off drive detection in the App.So it's a flaming rocket all time time !!!!
I pulled this from the ADV missing rider thread... I think you're asking if anyone test it before they use it? Simple answer is, of course, but by testing it you are using it.That only one data point and not offered as anything more. What I'm curios about is if anyone using these devices uses it for tracking in simple short trips just to see that it works. These have subscription plans. Does it cost you to use them routinely where a breakdown or crash doesn't mean a SAR callout? Most smartphones can offer tracking where there's cell service. The iPhone 14 and 15 offer satellite connectivity. Phones are used often so there's not much question of finding it not working at a bad time. This assumes that functioning tracking indicates the satellite function will work. There's that word.
Jesu Cristo Will, you pulled the 1/10 of 1% with that one.In the past I just used the iPhone, had a problem outside Elk City, ID. Two people watching me on three different "services*" could not see my location and they were not happy about it. In order to keep the peace I went with the Garmin.
*Services were Find My, Google Location Sharing, Spotwalla. These all are cell based and I found that 1% spot @TPadden refers, and I spent two days there.
That seems to be a reasonable rate. Tracking on the map gives the viewer a reasonable idea where you are, though you can cover a lot of distance in those ten minutes. When you’re stationary for at least for 20 minutes the accuracy of your location is pretty good.I will set to every 10 minutes.
I was asking if anybody routinely tested it by using it on short trips and not waiting for x-country jaunts. This was because I knew someone who had a failure to track. I don't recall hearing an explanation as to where the failure occurred. Dust it off every so often and use it on a day ride type of thing.I think you're asking if anyone test it before they use it? Simple answer is, of course, but by testing it you are using it.
In my case and probably many others, the subscription limits testing between uses. I will be using it next week to see the sun rise at the Golden Gate Bridge.I was asking if anybody routinely tested it by using it on short trips and not waiting for x-country jaunts. This was because I knew someone who had a failure to track. I don't recall hearing an explanation as to where the failure occurred. Dust it off every so often and use it on a day ride type of thing.
I was wondering how usage worked. So you activate a subscription when going to use it and hibernate it otherwise?the subscription limits testing between uses.
The minimum period you can activate the InReach is 30 days (at least here in the GWN) so you can plan accordingly. Something to be aware of.....Garmin charges a fee to be able to turn the unit on and off so you need to do the math. It may be just as economical to go with an annual subscription and then you don't have to worry about activating/deactivating the unit.I was wondering how usage worked. So you activate a subscription when going to use it and hibernate it otherwise?