- Joined
- May 27, 2021
- Messages
- 1,159
- Age
- 64
- Location
- Coquitlam British Columbia Canada
- Bike
- 2009 ST1300
Don't know how I screwed that up, sorry A.S. I kind of piggy backed / highjacked your thread.
It most commonly seems to happen at a sustained 4,000 RPM or over at full operating temperature- i.e. closed loop operation. If someone were to go for a ride and cruise below 4,000 RPM with only momentary RPM bursts above that threshold, it is possible that it may not appear for quite a while.It seems that just from reading submissions that in some instances the faults occur at a specific load / rpm and in others they might run for some duration and reoccur.
Quite a few people have been operating their ST1300's with this problem present and have not reported any adverse effects other than reduced performance when the FI light is on. My reservation in doing that for a prolonged period would be if there was a situation where a genuine pre-ignition (pinging) problem had developed and went undetected by the rider. In this scenario, the ECM is not correcting for the problem. If left for a prolonged period, is one running the risk of engine damage as a result?I guess the only two reservations I'd have with that idea might be whether or not I'm running the risk of creating a greater risk of component failure which could result in a fault while you're riding, and if the repaired ECU might cause a problem with the test bike.
One more point folks.
I am surprised at the replies I have received in this thread. I have been hanging around motorcycle forums for about 25 years (BMWMOA, Concours.org, HDforums.com, KLR650...etc)
I paid $3500 for my bike in 4/2016 with 26K, and I still, as recently as 3 weeks ago at a memorial/charity ride have people ask me if my ST is new. The bike owes me nothing, and I am in now way complaining I have to replace a ECU in a 18+ year old bike. The only thing I will complain about is the $813 cost for a new ECM.
That's where these forums have served me very well over the years. I have saved a boat load of money, and time because of the folks on these forums.
I am surprised at the replies I have received telling me why this won't work. I'm not stupid, I already know this is a low percentage play. But, what f I am right? I happen to know of two motorcycles that were repaired this way (one by yours truly), and a buddy and I repaired the ECU in his Yamaha wave runner this way. Maybe I can save the next guy $800 who comes to this forum to look for a solution for his intermittent 26 code.
My only decision now is whether I am going to pull my ECU and crack it open, or spend $800 for a replacement, then crack mine open. It's already a paper weight; why not, right? I guess the third option would be to replace mine, throw the bad one in the trash bin and go riding.
The original purpose of this post was to hopefully find someone who has attempted to open one of these.
I would like to add one additional question. I know some folks have come across burned/charred knock sensor wires; but has anyone actually had a bad sensor?
I'm in the same boat with the code issue. Where did you find the $813 for the ECM?
Quite a few people have been operating their ST1300's with this problem present and have not reported any adverse effects other than reduced performance when the FI light is on. My reservation in doing that for a prolonged period would be if there was a situation where a genuine pre-ignition (pinging) problem had developed and went undetected by the rider. In this scenario, the ECM is not correcting for the problem. If left for a prolonged period, is one running the risk of engine damage as a result?
Do we know that? Maybe, to the contrary, when the light comes on, the ECU is in fact constantly correcting (retarding timing?) for a problem that doesn't exist, hence loss of performance and mpg? Who knows?
As you say, some have been riding with the light on for a while, some have for years now, and no reports of major adverse effects yet?
I'm in the same boat with the code issue. Where did you find the $813 for the ECM?
-No, I don't know it for sure. I know ECM's often will default to a pre-programmed setting for the control circuit exhibiting the fault. If there was an engine knock still present beyond that threshold, there would be no further compensation.Do we know that? Maybe, to the contrary, when the light comes on, the ECU is in fact constantly correcting (retarding timing?) for a problem that doesn't exist, hence loss of performance and mpg? Who knows?
As you say, some have been riding with the light on for a while, some have for years now, and no reports of major adverse effects yet?
I have read that others are living with this fault sode, I remember one person ststing he just stays under 70mph.
With my experience, the light resets everytime the bike is turned off, but returns once the bike runs over 4500rpm for approximately 10 seconds. I have tested this in my garage, and once the light trips the rpm drops about 500, as the timing changed to compensate for the perceived knock.
However, if I pull the battery connection, it resets completely, and will not trip, even at 100mph for 30 seconds. Eventually my light returns, afetr more than 300 miles.
Honda Canada strikes again !!you sitting down?...................$1875
Is that quoted from the local dealer, or have you managed to find an online oem parts source here in Canada? Inquiring minds.....For shits and giggles I just looked up the price for my '04 here in Canada,...............you sitting down?...................$1875
Even accounting for exchange rate.........................just WOW!