And another:
So not running weights at all or just compensating for the "Supra Balancing" with beads?
Now for a bit more serious answer.My observations gleaned from some 80 sets of tires on different bikes, including the ST.
- many of today's tires do not require balancing. Manufacturing tolerances are better? Who knows? But many tires do not seem to need balancing. Not saying there are not some wheels that are out of balance though. I check my wheels' balance periodically and always check the balance of newly mounted tires and balance if needed. Cleaning the rim is a step that some people skip when balancing.
- Ride On - expensive, and did not prevent all flats (in my experience). When you take a tire off, with it in place, I found it was distributed in a relatively narrow band around the center of the tread area. Any puncture off that narrow line would not have been affected by the Ride On. I don't know how many flats it prevented but I had flat tires using Ride On where the puncture was well within the tread. It doesn't take too many bottles of Ride On to pay for a balancer.
- glass beads - I only used these on a couple of tires before I quit. The reason being that the glass tended to get pulverized into a very fine powder and this powder would clog the schrader valve, when checking the pressure, resulting in a slow leak.
Net result - I just check and balance if needed. YMMV
I question not only your statement, but also your logic on this.Every new tire I buy gets balanced before being installed. They remain balanced throughout their life.
Given that experience, I won't be using balancing beads regardless whether they work or not.
If I had issues with tires going out of balance mid-life, I might reconsider using beads or I might just have the tires re-balanced since that's been working pretty well for me.
There was never any logic intended. It was just my lousy "Dad" sense of humor showing itself. You know, the kind of humor everyone just groans about after you try to tell a joke?I question not only your statement, but also your logic on this.