My Garmin 2610 reads 65 mph when my ST1100 speedometer reads 60 mph. Seems like a pretty big difference. Which should I believe? I tend to believe the Garmin.
When you're moving, the GPS is constantly running speed calculations based on its most recent info from the satellites, and if you're in an area where you're not getting good steady satellite data, the calculations can get laughably wrong, and the max speed memory will capture them.I experianced today exactly what Mandel is stating ocurr's. I saw my max speed was 134 MPH. I know I was never near that today Nor any other day for that matter. I always reset the max speed to avoid an inquisitive oliceST: so it must have lost it's reference at one point today.
My riding buddie stated exactly what Mandel did.
I do take into consideration that the ST speedo is about 5 % off the actual speed. ( slower than actual speed )
Joe
That's sounds about opposite most everyone's experience. Usually the more accurate GPS indicates an actual speed almost 10% lower than the ST indicates.
Obviously, YMMV.
Jon
On the other hand, a GPS will only sample your location at fixed intervals, so your wheels could travel more distance than the GPS would see. If you look at a GPS track of tight twisties, lt looks like a zig-zag and you don't see the radius of the turns.
GPS is also subject to error when it comes to speed readings. It's not that uncommon to see a top speed reading over 100 when you know you haven't gone a bit over 99.
I believe Curt has the factor pretty close at 7 % difference.
Joe